国家变得越来越相似，因为人们可以在*任何地方买到相同的产品。你认为这是积极的还是消极的发展?今天北京朗阁小编给大家介绍一下雅思写作必背范文40篇！
国家变得越来越相似，因为人们可以在*任何地方买到相同的产品。你认为这是积极的还是消极的发展?今天北京朗阁小编给大家介绍一下雅思写作必背范文40篇！
写作是一个量的过程，需要漫长的积累，但是一味地要求原创，不去吸取别人的经验，是很难得到*的。我们需要背诵范文，从*习到一些词汇和句式去*自己的能力，由于范文太多，只能一篇一篇的介绍给大家了.
雅思写作必背范文 40 篇-13
Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
It is said that countries are becoming similar to each other because of the global spread of the same products, which are now available for purchase almost anywhere. I strongly believe that this modern development is largely detrimental to culture and traditions worldwide.
A country’s history, language and ethos are all inextricably bound up in its manufactured artefacts. If the relentless advance of international brands into every corner of the world continues, these bland packages might one day completely oust the traditional objects of a nation, which would be a loss of richness and diversity in the world, as well as the sad disappearance of the manifestations of a place’s character. What would a Japanese tea ceremony be without its specially crafted teapot, or a Fijian kava ritual without its bowl made from a certain type of tree bark?
Let us not forget either that traditional products, whether these be medicines, cosmetics, toys , clothes, utensils or food, provide employment for local people. The spread of multinational products can often bring in its wake a loss of jobs, as people turn to buying the new brand, perhaps, thinking it more glamorous than the one they are used to. This eventually puts old-school craftspeople out of work.
Finally, tourism numbers may also be affected, as travelers become disillusioned with finding every place just the same as the one they visited previously. To see the same products in shops the world over is boring, and does not impel visitors to open their wallets in the same way that trinkets or souvenirs unique to the particular area do.
Some may argue that all people are entitled to have access to the same products, but I say that local objects suit local conditions best, and that faceless uniformity worldwide is an unwelcome and dreary prospect.
